Jeffrey Neuman and Todd Ryan are Respected Industry Leaders.
Every Tuesday at Noon PST / 3pm EST, Jeff and Todd host the Domain Name Law Show.
Visit DNLshow.com for show information, including links to listen live and for replays.
Free Consultation
+1.888.897.0886
JJN Solutions Law, PLLC represents trademark holders and domain registrants before The Forum, WIPO, and other accredited UDRP providers.
All gTLD domain name registrations are subject to a mandatory dispute resolution process called the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP). Under the policy, trademark owners may bring an action against a domain name registrant if the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.
The UDRP was created through a multi-stakeholder process within ICANN in 1998 to address clear-cut cases of trademark abuse, also known as "cybersquatting." It functions as a quasi-arbitration before accredited dispute providers including The Forum and WIPO. Domain name disputes are heard by "Panelists" at the respective dispute providers.
Jeffrey J. Neuman is an accredited Panelist at The Forum and has also served on 3-member panels for cases brought at WIPO — giving him unparalleled insight into both sides of every dispute.
Applies to all major gTLDs (.com, .net, .org, .biz, .info, .xyz, and more)
Accredited providers include WIPO, The Forum (ADR Forum), CIIDRC, and ADNDRC
A successful UDRP complaint can result in domain transfer or cancellation
Respondents must answer within 20 days or risk a default decision
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) findings protect legitimate domain owners
JJN Solutions represents both complainants and respondents in UDRP proceedings
Cases decided by Jeffrey J. Neuman as an accredited Panelist at The Forum.
FA2602002206245 · Decided: March 25, 2026
Respondent prevailed and the Panel found Reverse Domain Name Hijacking. The Panel held that the domain name remained with Respondent.
UDRP DigestFA2601002201239 · Decided: March 2, 2026
Complainant prevailed and the domain name was transferred.
FA2501002137617 · Decided: March 11, 2025
Complainant prevailed and the domain name was transferred.
FA2407002106243 · Decided: August 20, 2024
Respondent prevailed and the Panel declined to transfer the domain name.
UDRP DigestD2024-0698 · Decided: May 23, 2024
Respondent prevailed and the Panel found Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.
UDRP DigestD2024-0182 · Decided: March 2024
Complainant prevailed and the domain name was transferred.
UDRP DigestFA1941414 · Decided: June 3, 2021
Complainant prevailed in demonstrating bad faith. The domain resolved to a random website unrelated to either party.
FA1969097 · Decided: November 24, 2021
Respondent prevailed due to the complex legal issues presented by both sides. The UDRP was intended for clear-cut cases of cybersquatting, not for cases more appropriate for national courts which depend on collection and cross-examination of evidence.
FA1969515 · Decided: December 9, 2021
Respondent prevailed and Complainant was found liable for Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.
FA1980684 · Decided: February 7, 2022
Complainant prevailed and both domain names were transferred.
Facing a domain name dispute? Need representation before The Forum or WIPO?
Contact Jeff Neuman View UDRP FAQ pageJeffrey Neuman and Todd Ryan are Respected Industry Leaders.
Every Tuesday at Noon PST / 3pm EST, Jeff and Todd host the Domain Name Law Show.
Visit DNLshow.com for show information, including links to listen live and for replays.
Legal and policy consultancy focusing on Internet, Infrastructure & Intellectual Property.
© 2026 JJN Solutions Law, PLLC • All Rights Reserved | Management services by StageMarx, LLC